|
Post by junpei on Dec 31, 2006 20:43:55 GMT 1
- sigh - It's not the words of god it's the word fo THE robot god. Also he doesn't use lightning bolts, to BC. Im pretty sure he switched to something else. I do nopt know what but I know it's something.
|
|
|
Post by archangel5871 on Dec 31, 2006 21:10:52 GMT 1
Something terribly painful, I am sure. And please do excuse me, Mr. Almighty Kurtzatron, I meant Robo God. Please do not smite me, I am but a mere mortal to your eminence.
I just realized that sounded very sarcastic... Not meant that way, by bad.
|
|
|
Post by Shamino Warhen Ph.D on Dec 31, 2006 22:33:45 GMT 1
You need a tissue? There's that bit of shit hanging off your nose.
|
|
|
Post by king on Jan 1, 2007 0:08:00 GMT 1
You know, I think that is probably the worst visual for ass kissing ever.....seriously, I am both impressed and disgusted.
Oh, and I don't need projectiles.
|
|
|
Post by archangel5871 on Jan 1, 2007 0:30:25 GMT 1
Man, I got Shamino on my IC and OOC. I have terrible luck, but I do applaud the comment; I couldn't have done better myself.
|
|
|
Post by junpei on Jan 1, 2007 5:42:53 GMT 1
Does bending over and kissing ass come naturally to you or do you actually work at it?
|
|
|
Post by Pain Killer on Jan 1, 2007 5:47:22 GMT 1
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, Jumpey.
|
|
|
Post by junpei on Jan 1, 2007 5:52:28 GMT 1
Yeah fortunetly my days of ass kissing ended... roughly six months ago.
|
|
|
Post by Darren Blayne on Jan 1, 2007 5:54:40 GMT 1
Once an ass-kisser, always an ass-kisser?
|
|
|
Post by junpei on Jan 1, 2007 6:53:19 GMT 1
You wish Capn, you wish.
|
|
|
Post by archangel5871 on Jan 1, 2007 7:34:33 GMT 1
Just wondering, but shouldnt this be locked up? I mean, it's gone way off track and the matter it was dealing with originally has been settled. Enough of the flaming Kuro time, OK? Bye.
~_~ All because I wanted to be a sneaky, coniving fucker...
|
|
|
Post by Odin Reeves on Jan 1, 2007 7:55:50 GMT 1
Instead your just an ass-kisser. Good job.
Now that I've had my say, yep, a locking is needed.
|
|
|
Post by Tiao Lei Shen on Jan 1, 2007 8:33:52 GMT 1
He's not necessarily jsut a brown noser, he's smart. You don't argue with Kurtzatron, it just doesn't work. Its always best to agree with him. Even if he is wrong on a subject, he will find a way to turn it around and still make you feel stupid. Go ahead, give it a try.
|
|
|
Post by archangel5871 on Jan 1, 2007 8:50:02 GMT 1
I'm usually up for an arguement, but I just dont really feel like getting into and havent for a while.... so let's leave it at that. Kurtzatron wins by default. And see, Junpei, I'm SMART! ^^
|
|
|
Post by king on Jan 1, 2007 10:52:06 GMT 1
I actually do carry a card in my wallet that says I'm always right.....oddly enough, it was a gift from my mother.
A completely unfounded ego is a GREAT tool at my age, I recommend getting one as soon as possible.
Anyway, I don't see this thread needing to be locked, we could quite possibly get back on topic. For Example:
A teams up with B to take C's position. A and B are successful. B betrays A at last minute and they fight. Does winner get the position, or does the fracture in power deny the winner their base and therefore C maintains position?
Discuss.
|
|
|
Post by Darren Blayne on Jan 1, 2007 11:09:11 GMT 1
It depends. When C was challenged, and would accept, it would stand to reason since he was only one man, and the position calls for only one person, he would have to name the person in which he would be potentially giving up the title to.
Thus, whoever would get it would be the one he stated. For the betrayer, if he weren't the one challenged, would have to pull something sneaky, aka, take his former 'partner' out first then declare that since he's in the battle, and his partner was out of commision, the shot should be held to him.
All in all, it'd be tough to negotiate for the team.
|
|
|
Post by archangel5871 on Jan 1, 2007 20:23:55 GMT 1
Could there be something to the effect of staggered matches between teams? Say, team A's captain and team B's captain challenge Captain/Pillar C, so if negotiated could Captain/Pillar C rally some of his/her supporters and create a "war" kind of fight between the groups? Inevitably if two teams oppose the Captain/Pillar one will have to come out the victor in one way or another and A or B will eventually try to take the other out; unless a dual-captain/pillarship could be maintained, but I do not see that working very well.
(Good job, Kurtzatron, btw)
|
|
|
Post by junpei on Jan 1, 2007 20:37:51 GMT 1
Problem. ANY PILLAR OR CAPTAIN CAN CHOOSE TO REFUSE A MATCH.
Even if you DO have the support of half the school, a Captain can just say "Only one fight a week please" or whatever and only have to fight once. Now your little staggered attack fails.
As stated before, THERE IS NO QUICK WAY TO DO THIS, QUIT TRYING!
|
|
|
Post by archangel5871 on Jan 1, 2007 20:49:14 GMT 1
It would make for a boring board if pillars/captains didn't take on completely wild challenges. Playing it overly safe just to keep a position isn't going to advance the storyline or create twists in the plot at all, so declining things out of the ordinary will only be helping that one person keep a title on an RP board rather than allowing his/herself and everyone else be entertained via complex storylines.
Stop your random nay-saying against me, Junpei, it's really starting to get on my nerves. And saying that there is no way of doing something IN A SEMI-REALISTIC FANTASY WORLD where one can do basically anything they want inside the world of physics and common sense makes you extremely ignorant.
|
|
|
Post by Kira Karyuudo, Hikari on Jan 1, 2007 21:14:57 GMT 1
Semi-realistic fantasy world? Okay, okay... Even if we try for the most realistic thing possible, it won't always work out like that. On the issue of a Captain/Pillar refusing and only letting one fight happen a week, that is realistic enough. Because the characters aren't machines, if they handled multiple fights on behalf of their title per day, in the five-day school week (and hey, is this going to be just a school-day based thing, or will challenges be allowed to be made on weekends/holidays as well?), they'd burn out. Limiting their fights is a smart thing, but not everyone is going to be happy with that. There's no saying that just because a Captain/Pillar says "No" that their reply wouldn't be heeded. People are bound to lose patience if they've been waiting a good while for the opportunity to fight. If they're put off enough, I could easily see it escalating to going so far as to jump said Captain/Pillar in a small group... They can claim afterwards (depending on where the fight took place, and who was there to witness it) that whoever it was [decided on in the group, another story altogether] is now a Pillar, only to be contested against by the actual Pillar. So, that being said, it would be realistic to refuse, as long as the Captain or Pillar knows what could come about because of it. It would add tension (as it's been stated that's what we're trying to achieve), and wouldn't by any means make the board boring. In fact, it could be a way to bring back (and break down) the gangs. That Golden Rule comes into effect. Edit: Note: I get free shots to anyone who doesn't know what the Golden Rule is (unlikely, but meh). And no, I'm not talking about the "Don't fuck with Liam." rule I had mentioned to me by 'Pei over MSN.
|
|